Clicky

888 Express Support for Multiple Skins to PA Gaming Board - PennsylvaniaCasinos.com News : PennsylvaniaCasinos.com News
  • 95 views
  • 3 minutes read
pa-gaming-board
Published on
Update on
Author

Itai Freiberger, the 888 Holdings CEO recently wrote to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board to explain why he thinks that allowing online gaming licenses to use multiple skins would be a really great idea. If you are familiar with online gambling then this must certainly seem like a non-issue since operators will, of course, be able to have more than one skin. Well, apparently, not necessarily.

Even though it is still too early to tell how the final regulations will play out, both the Penn National and the Parx Casino wrote the to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) in a bid to push for the implementation of a one skin per license framework. Both of them have argued that each gambling site should be branded the same or, if absolutely necessary, very similar to the brand of the license. For instance, Parx Casino would only be able to have ParxPoker.

Furthermore, the two casinos also fear that, among many other things, the existence of multiple brands would serve to effectively give room for the skirting of the rules regarding the maximum number of licences operators are allowed in Pennsylvania. Among their other fears, Penn National and Parx Casino worry that land-based casinos could be cannibalized by the already-established online gaming brands if they are allowed multiple skins.

888 Holdings Disagrees

As an online gaming operator with a great deal of international presence, 888 naturally advocates for the multiple skins. In the letter, Freiberger outlines that it is okay for Pennsylvanian, casinos to leverage their own brands within the state’s market, but being an established international brand gives the licensee immediate legitimacy in the market, especially among avid followers of online gambling.

Contrary to the way Penn National and Parx Casino framed it, 888 sort to clarify that the skins would be linked to a single license holder and not disparate software providers outside the state’s or even the country’s borders. The operator further cites New Jersey in a bid to address the fears of the Parx Casino and Penn International. This was in a statement that pointed out that New Jerseys “online offerings of both local and non-local brands have had an overall positive impact on the total reported revenue of the land-based licensees.”

The point that 888 was trying to make here is that the Pennsylvanian casinos have already built a great foundation for their brands within the state and therefore they naturally possess an inherent upper hand over newcomers in that particular market, 888 included. To some extent, this argument is actually logical – experienced online gamblers are likely to go for the big international brands like PokerStars and 888, but a majority of Pennsylvanians are more likely to opt for the local options simply because they trust the brands and have had plenty of time to enjoy the casinos. Alternatively, the local and international brands could partner up, but this is still quite a long shot.

Editor's Picks

US Department of Justice Files Notice of Appeal for Wire Act

On Friday, August 16, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) officially filed a Notice of Appeal in the civil case that it recently lost to the New Hampshire Lottery Commission (NHLC) over the reinterpretation of the 1961 Wire act opinion. The Notice of Appeal was filed by the DOJ, led by Attorney General William […]

Revenue Stats Reveal Modest Start for Pennsylvanian Online Gambling

On Friday, August 15, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board released revenue figures for the state’s online gambling industry which officially kicked off in July, and from the looks of it, the sector is on the right trajectory. According to the gaming regulator, the state’s three online gaming operators brought in a total of $812,306 between […]

PGCB Criticizes Plans by Operators to Reduce Slot Machines

On Wednesday, August 14, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board held a hearing in Harrisburg that saw to the unfolding of a number of regulatory actions. However, most of the time was spent addressing three petitions that sought to reduce gaming floors at certain venues. The most notable petitions were filed by Presque Isle Downs Casino, […]

Similar Stories in Gambling

SugarHouse Casino to Rebrand in the Fall

Philadelphia’s Sugar House Casino is soon set to rebrand as part of a series of upgrades that Rush Street Gaming, the property’s owner, has planned. This fall, the gaming and entertainment complex will officially change its name to Rivers Casino Philadelphia. As it turns out, these changes have been part of the company’s plans for […]

PGCB Approves the Sale of Sands Bethlehem to Wind Creek

Over a year after the deal was announced, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has finally approved the sale of the $1.3 Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem to an affiliate of an Indian Tribe. The transaction which was announced on Wednesday, May 29 by Wind Creek Hospitality which is affiliated to the Poarch Band of Creek Indians […]

Online Sports Betting Finally Arrives in Pennsylvania

It has been a long time coming but Pennsylvanian sports betting fans are now going to be able to place bets online. This news came on Tuesday, May 28 when the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board gave Philadelphia’s SugarHouse Casino the green light to launch its online sports betting offering making is the very first casino […]

MGM No Longer Interested in Wynn’s Greater Boston Casino

Last week, news emerged that MGM Resorts International had entered talks with Wynn Resorts over the possible acquisition of the $2.6 billion Encore Boston Harbor. Latest news reveals that MGM has opted to break off the talks to buy the Greater Boston casino property citing a number of concerns that were voiced by the casino […]