Clicky

DOJ Decision Can Be Fought in PA - PennsylvaniaCasinos.com News : PennsylvaniaCasinos.com News
  • 81 views
  • 3 minutes read
The DOJ's main entrance.
Published on
Update on

With the Department of Justice (DoJ) openly pushing for the restriction of online gambling in the United States, Pennsylvania is in the process of re-examining its own forecasts for the iGaming industry in the state, slated to arrive in the third quarter of 2019.

On Thursday, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) announced that the official launch of iGaming products in the Keynote State will have to wait until July. During the official hearing, the state’s regulator specified that part of the decision was motivated by the newly-created uncertainty by the Wire Act Opinion signed into law earlier this year.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and Reuters both reported on the involvement of casino mogul Sheldon Adelson in the striking down of the Wire Act Opinion of 2011. With the latest evidence, the interpretation of the Wire Act is dubious at best. Worse, it threatens a multi-billion industry that has been bolstering the state’s coffers.

PA Online Lottery Is Source of Wealth for the State

The Wire Act threatens Pennsylvania’s existing contracts with other state lotteries. The net revenue generated through lottery sales reaches $4 billion a year, just in PA alone one billion of which is deposited directly into various senior programs around Pennsylvania.

Why is the new Opinion making it difficult for businesses to operate? Simply put, the Wire Act makes it possible for states to share lottery servers, slash costs, and generally pool their resources to get better value for the same product.

Interstate exchanges of data are presently allowed, but with the clock ticking on the new Opinion to take effect in weeks, such businesses will be non-compliant with the federal norm. Maryland Lottery Director Gordon Medenica tried to explain the issue by highlighting the fact that introducing new servers was never really part of the deal.

Mr. Medenica explained that an undertaking such as that was incredibly difficult to accomplish, to speak nothing of the disruption it would bring in the system and the over-costs. However, not complying with the law would leave Pennsylvania vulnerable to litigation.

How to Handle DOJ’s Opinion? Take the Fight to the Enemy

Speaking of litigation, it’s very likely that the DOJ will have to handle many lawsuits. New Hampshire has already launched three of those – some filed by state lawmakers, others by trade groups. States that feel at risk are already taking the fight back to DOJ and rightly so.

The reversal of the Wire Act can affect banking as well. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 has long been in the root of much of the problems that operators and users face, as UIEGA effectively prompts banks to block payment coming from iGaming or sports betting providers.

In light of DOJ’s renewed gunk-ho stance, more financial institutions may grow wary of the DOJ coming after their own offer. There are a lot of possible scenarios for the industry in Pennsylvania as is, but it’s unlikely to see the state unaffected, unless of course, massive litigation from multiple parties demonstrates the resolve of an overwhelming mass of people to stop the decision in its tracks, making it legally inefficient.

Editor's Picks

PokerStars Now Fully Operational in Pennsylvania

Following a two-day day test period that kicked off on November 4, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board on Wednesday, November 6 approved PokerStars for full operations. Now the online gambling operator will be able to legally offer a range of online poker and casino games to the Pennsylvania gamblers. The debut of PokerStars in the […]

Did Pa. Lawmakers Overlook Terms of Mini Casino Sports Betting?

In a rather unexpected twist, there seems to be a possibility of an uneven playing field in as far as sports betting in the Keystone State is concerned. It is hard to tell if this was an intended move or whether it is a mere consequence of the way the state’s lawmakers dealt with the […]

PGCB Levies $120,000 in Fines for Gambling Failures

The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board has recently issued a whopping $120,000 in fines as part of its regulatory efforts. These fines were issued against two of the Keystone State’s licensed gambling operators who had let their guard down and allowed for some regulatory failures to occur at their facilities. Before issuing the fines, the gaming […]

Similar Stories in Gambling

US Department of Justice Files Notice of Appeal for Wire Act

On Friday, August 16, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) officially filed a Notice of Appeal in the civil case that it recently lost to the New Hampshire Lottery Commission (NHLC) over the reinterpretation of the 1961 Wire act opinion. The Notice of Appeal was filed by the DOJ, led by Attorney General William […]

Sports Betting is Now Legal and Regulated in New York

Mid this month, the Empire State saw the launch of its very first regulated sportsbook. This comes six years after the enabling law was passed and a little over a year since the United Supreme Court abolished the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA). Sports betting in the state was authorized under a voter-approved […]

GAN, FanDuel Expand Pennsylvania Online Gaming Partnership

Renowned online gambling software developer and solutions provider GAN last week announced that it would be making substantial additions to the services that it currently provides to FanDuel Group which is owned by Flutter Entertainment, the behemoth gambling operator that was previously known as Paddy Power Betfair. The expansion will be going down in the […]

Congress Reportedly Planning to Defund DOJ Wire Act Opinion

Just a little over two weeks after a federal court ruled against its recent reinterpretation of the 1961 Wire Act, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has suffered yet another potential blow. This is because Congress has taken a keen interest in fighting against the recently-published Wire Act opinion that was set to effectively […]